Rudolf Rietveld Mr. W…… Mr. H. Bolhaar drs. mr. R. Mud officier Justitie te Alkmaar .
Breaking News 04 -04 – 2013 Ruim 250 documenten Overheid bagger worden bewerkt, zowel geplaatst vanaf andere kant wereld !
Deze pagina gaat een kleinschalige opsomming van documenten worden bestaande uit :
http://www.mstsnl.net/rietveld/rietveld-rutte.htm ( klik op deze link )
Heren mr. H. Bolhaar zowel mr. R. Mud, tevens Drs. M. Rutte Minister President, zie foto ) wie is voor deze sinistere justitie ramp verantwoordelijk ? Zie misdrijven in zaken Rudolf Rietveld !
In belastingparadijs Nederland koestert men ook het meest corrupte rechtssysteem ter wereld en zie de lijst van organisaties die werden geïnformeerd over die rechterlijke valsheid in geschrifte: lees de punten tot nr 65 inclusief al Linken :
Bij deze zet Rietveld zijn tegen aanval te samen vanuit Sint Maarten voort, daar komt bij vanuit India dan wel Indonesië, foto onder zou naar de voorzichtige inschatting van Rietveld al lang de ogen geopend moeten hebben .
Teksten in onderstaande reeks van documenten, dan wel berichten taal technisch niets aan veranderd, en wel met speciale reden !
Mr. W………
37.The Applicants would like to establish the fact that all and above it is happening with the know ledge of Hare Majesteit de Koningin, de Gouverneur van Sint Maarten Dhr Eugene Bernard Holidayde Minister van Veiligheid en Justitie Dhr Ivo Opstelten, de President van de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Dhr. G.J.M. Corstens, de Procureur Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Dhr J.W.FokkensPlaatsvervangend Procureur-Generaal Mw. C. L.de Vries Lentsch - Kostense, de Nationale Ombudsman Dhr. Alex Brenninkmeijer ,de Procureur-generaal Dhr. Dick Piar, de Hoofdaanklager Dhr. Hans Mosmr. H. Bolhaar, zie foto etc!
Rudolf Rietveld met achter Kleinzoon Ghandi te Indonesië 2007 op foto links, daarna in 2011 elkaar gesproken te Hong Kong, zie de Kaasschaaf misdrijven op Rietveld van het Openbaar Ministerie te Utrecht / Alkmaar ! ( schiphol – Veenendaal Castricum Politie geboefte, met uitzonderingen, zie elders op deze pagina ! Men is te gecorrumpeerd zowel te arrogant dan wel uitermate dom om de gedachten te hebben, misdaad op te voeren om de vorige, over tijd perk 13 jaar trachten te onderdrukken, dat gaat niet lukken J.W. Schippers dan wel P. Kloosterman werkzaam als ongeleide projectielen aangestuurd door o.a. mr. R. Mud. Dhr. Kraakman ( integere Politie ambtenaar werkzaam op Locatie te Castricum ) daar buiten gelaten !
Rietveld komt zeer binnenkort ook met Politie Ambtenaar Brummelkamp in zaken Bankrover uit IJmuiden op de proppen, Je hebt oorlog Schippers, en dat leverd nog meer slachtoffers op, dit punt al aangegeven door mr. Mud te Haarlem in 2005 .
P. Kloosterman werkzaam bij Politie tussen Castricum – Bergen – NHN
Daar komt sinds kort bij : ene rick.harpman@kennemerland.politie.nl . Wat is reden R. Harpman dat Politie Kennemerland geen aangiften opneemt tegen een oplichter R. Jaasma, door ene Dame Mw. J. Grevelink aanhangig willen maken uit Heemskerk zowel de zelfde Harpman geen aangiften van Rietveld tegen R. Jaasma heeft willen opnemen, welke Justitie Criminelen moet men beschermen bij de roedel Politie individu werkzaam op de 1e Groenelaan te Castricum, inmiddels gevolg door Politie Kennemerland !!!
Oplichter R. Jaasma, Rietveld betrekt daar binnenkort bij Makelaar A. Hopman uit Castricum, denk erom Schippers dat je nogmaals de beer hebt wakker gemaakt Rietveld zijn derde Auto weg te laten Stelen, Dinsdag a.s. heb je een Enveloppe in je toko te Castricum, goede notitie van nemen, lijkt mij verstandig, daar het nog daar diverse andere locatie wordt verzonden, alleen iets anders als zijnde inhoud !
Mr. W ….
Sint Maarten
March.31.2013.
Open Letter
Application
On the subject of: EXTORTION and FORGERIES in the
Courthouse of Sint Maarten!
Hereby the Applicants informs Your Honorable Members
of the Dutch Judiciary,Government, Government and Non
Government organizations/institutions and the Press
guardians of the Rule of Law and fundamental human
rights as follows:
Before the Applicants present the facts they would
like to declarethe following: Since Feb.24.2011 up
to date March.31.2013 the Applicants believe that
Judge R.W.J. van Veen is responsible for the acts
of EXTORTION and severe destruction of the Rule of
Law in the Courtrooms of the Court of First Instance
Sint Maarten and not Judge C.T.M.Luijks (as appear
below)!
Statement of the facts
Facts
1. The First Applicant (Evmolpia Private Foundation)is
registered and functioning in Sint Maarten (Exhibit 1-
Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtveHdwN0Q3VWoyZ2c/edit?usp=sharing ).
2.The Second Applicant (Yordan S. Busarov) is a Bulgarian
citizen,living and working in Sint Maarten since year
2000(Exhibit 2- Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtveVdKc2haLUtucTA/edit?usp=sharing
Both Applicants are referred below as The Applicants.
3.Judge Mr. R.W.J.van Veen is the Vice-President of the
Joint Courtof Justice of Aruba, Curacao, Sint Maarten
and of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba (the Court),
President of the Supervisory Board of Pointe Blanche
Prison Sint Maarten, Senior Judge in the Court of First
Instance Sint Maarten and Vice-Chairman in the stichting
Beroepsopleiding Advocatuur of St. Maarten (SBA SXM).
4.In year 2010 the Applicants started Bodemprocedure
184/2010 aimingo to annul false Mortgage Deeds for USD
1.670.000.00 (one million six hundred and seventy thousand
US Dollars) attached to the property of the First Applicant
(Foundation without Bank Accounts)!
5.On 28.Jan. 2011 one person (part of a unlawful organization
specialized in Forgery, Mortgage Fraud, Money Laundering and
Tax Evasion)started KG 10/2011 with unconstitutional request!
This personsubmitted to the Court of First Instance Sint Maarten
an untrue document (Exhibit -"PRODUCTIE )5"Please go to :
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvNmhDUEE2TXE5RG8/edit?usp=sharing
And requested the Court of First Instance of Sint Maarten
to orderto The Applicants to sign this false document, or
penalty USD 10 000.00 PER DAY! The Court Case KG 10/2011
was handled from the Judge Mr. C.T.M.Luijks!
6.On Feb.24.2011 The Applicants received(personally from
Judge R.W.J.van Veen) provisionally enforceable judgment
#16 ("vonnis"- Exhibit 4-Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvSmxPME55ZEs5Mk0/edit?usp=sharing
Please read the last page- "beslissing"!In this judgment
the Judge Mr.C.T.M.Luijks ordered to The Applicants to
sign (against their will and conscience) untrue document
(Exhibit 3/"PRODUCTIE 5") and forbid to The Applicants
any further attempts to receive Proper Administration
of Justice,under a threat of a penalty USD 5 000.00(FIVE
THOUSAND US Dollars) PER DAY,up-to USD 500 000.00(five
hundred thousand US Dollars)! The Applicants will not
comment at this time the fact that this provisionally
en forceable "vonnis" was not signed,not registered.
etc, in breach of Wetboek van Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering
Rv Afdeling 4. Het algemeen register, het proces-verbaal
van de zitting en vonnissen in het algemeen Artikel 45
naar Artikel 68
(Rv)!
7. Someone from the Court House of Sint Maarten decided
that USD 500000.00(five hundred thousand US Dollars) it
is not sufficient threat for extortion and few days
later The Applicants were summoned with different/forged
"vonnis/eerste grosse - In naam Der Koningin"/Exhibit 5-
Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvNnZSNkxwS1pvTDg/edit?usp=sharing
In this "eerste grosse" the penalty was increased up to
USD 1.000.000.00(one million US Dollars)!Please read the
last page- "beslissing"!
8.The Applicants informed the Chief-Prosecutor of Sint
Maarten Mr. Hans Mos and requested investigation and
prosecution of the perpetrator(s)! On May.03.2011 the
request was rejected (Exhibit 6 Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvd01Gdk1VUVBWV2s/edit?usp=sharing
9. After the humiliating and degrading Judgment/"vonnis"
to KG 10/2011, the Applicants submitted request for
disqualification of Judge Mr.C.T.M.Luijks in the Proce
dings on the merits (Bodemprocedure) AR 19/2010.
Ten minutes before the hearing the to this request (on
May.06.2011 the Applicants were called in the reception
of the Court and received letter from Judge R.W.J.van Veen
explaining that the forged "eerste grosse" it is a
negligence (Exhibit 7 Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvNUVpMTNfeFJMRzA/edit?usp=sharing
10.In the hearing to the request for disqualification
the Applicantsreceived personally from Judge Mr.
C.T.M.Luijks a document with his original signature
( Exhibit 8/Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvMUZmdzVBMzJXT0U/edit?usp=sharing
11.After the hearing to the request for disqualification
the Applicants received personally from Judge R.W.J.van
Veen different copy of the "eerste grosse"Exhibit 9-Pleae
go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvQXNZNW90aWFHTms/edit?usp=sharing
Even for "unarmed eye" it is obvious that the signature
on the " eerste grosse"Exhibit 8 it is "poor" imitation
of the original signature of the Judge Mr. CTM.Luijks-
Exhibit 9! Please compare the signatures on Exhibit 8
and Exhibit 9.
12.With irrefutable evidences "in hand" the Applicants
once again informed/contacted the Chief-Prosecutor of
Sint Maarten Mr. Hans Mos and requested investigation
and prosecution of the perpetrator(s)! The request was
rejected without any justified reason! After the refusal
of Chief-Prosecutor Mr. Hans Mos to investigate extortion
and forgery in the Courthouse of Sint Maarten, the
Applicants submitted complaint against Mr.Hans Mos to the
Voorzitter college van procureurs-generaal Mr. H.J. Bolhaar
The Complaint was forwarded to the Procureur-generaal Dhr.
Dick Piar (Exhibit 10/Please go
to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvcmlmclVjRFBNM3c/edit?usp=sharing
13.The Procureur-generaal Dhr. Dick Piar not only
refuse to examine the compelling evidences, The Procureur
generaal Dhr. Dick Piarordered to the Chief Prosecutor Mr. Hans Mos"not to answer those letters/petitions any more" Exhibit 11/Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvTlEySlE5NlY3MEE/edit?usp=sharing
14.After the Openbaar Ministerie (OM) refuse to investigate
the forgeries in the Court House of Sint Maarten, The
Applicants were summoned(on April.05.2011 and Aug.23.2011)with
a claims in total amount of USD 480 000.00(FOUR HUNDRED AND
EIGHTY THOUSAND US Dollars) Exhibit 12/Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvVGZRb0hpVE5VdWs/edit?usp=sharing.
15.Judge R.W.J.van Veen used those claims(submitted as
productie 9)in EJ 21/2012 to "declare" the First Applicant
"Bankrupt", to order the illegal imprisonment of the Applicants andthe illegal lifetime Home-detention! Please find details about theillegal imprisonment and the illegal lifetime Home-detention of
the Applicants after the questions below (in the Open Letter/e-mailsend on March.26.2013)!
16.The Applicants would like to establish the fact that all
and above it is happerning with the knowledge of of Hare
Majesteit de Koningin,de Gouverneur van Sint Maarten Dhr Eugene
Bernard Holiday, de Minister van Veiligheid en Justitie Dhr
Ivo Opstelten, de Presidentvan de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
Dhr. G.J.M. Corstens, de ProcureurGeneraal bij de Hoge Raad
der Nederlanden Dhr J.W.Fokkens, Plaats vervangend Procureur
Generaal Mw. C. L. de Vries Lentsch-Kostense, de Voorzitter
college van procureurs-generaal Mr. H.J. Bolhaar de Nationale
Ombudsman Dhr. Alex Brenninkmeijer ,de Procureur-generaal Dhr.
Dick Piar, de Hoofdaanklager Dhr. Hans Mos....etc
The opinion of the Applicants is that the following questions
should be asked:
1.How haughty a Judge should be, to abuse the power invested
in him and to order to the Applicants to sign false document
under a threat of USD 500 000.00 (half million US Dollars)?
2.How contemptuous a Judge should be, to abuse the power
invested in him and to forbid to the Applicants to request
Proper Administration of Justice under a threat of USD
500 000.00 (half million US Dollars)?
3.How overbearing a Judge should be, to abuse the power
invested in him and to order the illegal imprisonment
and the illegal lifetime Home-detention of the Applicants?
4.How can be possible everyone within the Kingdom of
the Netherlandto be "blind and deaf" for the extortions,
forgeries, ill treatments, illegal punishments, acts of
arbitrariness, acts of direct coercion, flagrant acts of
intimidation and severe destruction of the fundamental
human rights in the Courtrooms of the Gemeenschappelijk
Hof van Justitie?
5.Is it the Openbaar Ministerie (OM) operating and
functional?
6.Is it the landelijke leiding van het Openbaar Ministerie
(College van procureurs-generaal in Den Haag) operating and
functional?
7.Is it the office of de Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge
Raad der Nederlanden operating and functional?
8.Why the Kingdom Laws exist if the competent authorities
(above) refuse to assure the implementation of those Laws
and act as they do not exist(Rijksbesluit rechtspositie
Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie Artikel 53 naar Artikel
64, Wet op de rechterlijke organisatie (Wet RO) Artikel 13
naar Artikel 13h, Rijkswet Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie
Artikel 29, Artikel 32, Artikel 33, Artikel en 34)?
9.How can be possible extortion to be performed "In naam
Der Koningin"?
10.For how long the extortions, forgeries, ill treatments
and illegal punishments(mentioned above and below) in the
Courtrooms of the Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie will
continue?
I hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, the information I have given in the present
application form is correct.
Respectfully: Y.Busarov (Second Applicant).
On his behalf and on behalf of Evmolia PF (First Applicant),
Place: Sint Maarten.
Date; March.31.2013.
Cell: +1721 587 3...
e-mail: jordan@cari....e....
p.s.
Please read below about: how Judge R.W.J.van Veen used
the claims mentioned above (-Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvVGZRb0hpVE5VdWs/edit?usp=sharing
In EJ 21/2012 and "declare" the First Applicant "Bankrupt",
ordered the illegal imprisonment of the Applicants and the
illegal lifetime Home-detention, or find printable signed
copy of the e-mail(s)/Application(s) here:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvZ2xZTWNzTDM4d2s/edit?usp=sharing
.
Open Letter Application
On the subject of: Illegal imprisonment and illegal
lifetime Home-detention, aiming to "cover up" Forgery,
Mortgage Fraud, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion
within the jurisdiction of the Kingdom of the
Netherlands.
Hereby the Applicants informs Your Honorable Members
of the Dutch Judiciary,Government, Government and Non
Government organizations/institutions and the Press,
guardians of the Rule of Law and fundamental human
rights as follows:
Statement of the facts
Facts
17.Before 10.10.2010 Sint Maarten was part of the
Netherlands Antilles.With effect from 10 October
2010, the Netherlands Antilles ceased to exist as
a part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. From that
date onwards, the Kingdom consists of four parts:
The Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten.
18.Within the Kingdom, the Netherlands has an obligation
to promote the wellbeing of its former colonies, as laid
down by the United Nations. The Kingdom of the Netherlands
is responsible for the protection of human rights, legal
certainty, and good governance inall its constituent
countries. On average, the Netherlands has between 22 to
34 Judges and numerous Public prosecutors working in the
Caribbean region of the Kingdom. These officials assist
and advise the Public Prosecutions Service and the Joint
Court of Justice(Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie).
19.The First Applicant (Evmolpia Private Foundation)is
registered and functioning in Sint Maarten (Annex 1-
Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtveHdwN0Q3VWoyZ2c/edit?usp=sharing
20.The Second Applicant (Yordan S. Busarov) is a Bulgarian
citizen, living and working in Sint Maarten since year 2000
(Annex 2- Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtveVdKc2haLUtucTA/edit?usp=sharing
Both Applicants are referred below as The Applicants.
21. Judge Mrs. Lisabeth Hoefdraad is the President of the
Joint Court of Justice of Aruba, Curacao, and Sint Maarten
and of BonaireSint Eustatius and Saba (the Court), President
of the Super visory Board over the Notaries and Candidate
Notaries (Kamer van Toezicht over de Notarissen en Kandidaat
Notarissen) and Knight in the Orderof Orange-Nassau.
22.Judge Mr. R.W.J.van Veen is the Vice-President of the
Joint Court of Justice of Aruba, Curacao, Sint Maarten
and of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba (the Court),
President of the Supervisory Board of Pointe Blanche
Prison Sint Maarten, Senior Judge in the Court of First
Instance Sint Maarten and Vice-Chairman in the stichting
Beroepsopleiding Advocatuur of St. Maarten (SBA SXM).
23.Attorney Mr. Ric Bergman is partner in BZSE Law Sint
Maarten,Chairman in the stichting Beroepsopleiding
Advocatuur of St. Maarten (SBA SXM) and is representing
Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F. Mingo in the
pending Appeal Court Case AR 184/2010-H-200/12Should be
noted the fact that the Applicants were illegally arrested
on April.13.2912 in the Court House of Sint Maarten and
illegallyPrevented of submitting Closing Arguments in in
the pending Appeal Court Case AR 184/2010-H-200/12.
24.The Vice-President of the Court Judge Mr. R.W.J.van
Veen and Attorney Mr. Rik (Gerrit Roland) Bergman are
sharing the Bank Account(s) of the stichting
Beroepsopleiding Advocatuur of St. Maarten (SBA SXM)
Please go to http://www.notarysps.com/Lawtrai%20.htm ! How
many and were nobody will ever know!
25.On 05.July.2007 and on Feb.26.2009 Standard Trust
Company N.V./Corinne de Tullio-Stam (as Managing Director
of the First Applicant)signed and registered false/untrue
documents. First and Second Mortgage deed with total amount
of USD 1 670 000.00(one million six hundred and seventy -
thousand US Dollars) was attached to the property of the
First Applicant/Evmolpia PF. The Applicants would liketo
establish the fact that the First Applicant/Evmolpia PF
does nothave and never had a Bank account and it is
impossible to receive USD 1.670 000.00(one million six
hundred and seventy thousand US Dollars).
26. in the beginning of March 2010 The Applicants
filed Complaint to the Supervisory Board over the
Notaries and Candidate Notaries in the Netherlands
Antilles and Aruba (Kamer van Toezicht over de
Notarissen en Kandidaat-Notarissen in de Nederlandse
Antillen en Aruba), against the illegal activities
of Notary F.E. Gijsbertha and Candidate Civil Law
Notary Mr. Marlene Mingo, as required by the Lawon
the notarial profession,Chapter VI. Supervision (Wet
op het notarisambt Hoofdstuk VI. Toezicht). The
Complaint was registered on March.22.2010. (Annex
3-Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvZkRzZXdDT0RXeEU/edit?usp=sharing
27.Since March22.2010 - up to date March.26.2013 The
Applicants informed dozens of times the President of
the Supervisory Board over the Notaries and Candidate
Notaries (President van de Kamer van Toezicht over de
Notarissen en Kandidaat-Notarissen) Mrs. L. Hoefdraad
of the illegal activities in Notary Office Gijsbertha,
and each time filed via (FedEx, e-mails and faxes)
dozens of new compelling evidence . Since March.23.2010
up to date -March.27.2013the Complaint is not handled,in
breach of the Law on the notarial profession, Chapter VI.
Supervision; Article 53 to Article 65a (Wet op het
notarisambt Hoofdstuk VI. Toezicht; Artikel 53 naar
Artikel 65a WN of Wna).
28.With the feeling of impunity on Sep.12.2011the
fraudulent Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F.
Mingo summoned the Applicants (without a Court Order
and in breach of all applicable Laws), presenting herself
as a Notary(Annex 4-Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvSUlfOHVUVzQySkk/edit?usp=sharing
29. Up to Jan.10.2012 the total amount of the
untrue/false Mortgage Deeds (attached to a Private
Foundation without Bank Account/The First Applicant) was
USD 1 670 000.00 (one million six hundred and seventy
thousand US Dollars) Annex 5-Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvSkY1YW1felhjU2c/edit?usp=sharing
30.With the feeling of impunity on Jan.10.2012the former
Notary F.E.Gisbertha illegally "transferred" five (of seven)
apartments (property of The First Applicant) for USD 550 000.00
Annex 6-Please
go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvdUIwRVRRWThPdFE/edit?usp=sharing
31. On Jan.11.2012 the five hundred and fifty thousand
US Dollars) "paid" for the five apartments disappeared, and
the total amount ofthe untrue Mortgage Deeds was illegally
increased with USD 835 000.00 (eight hundred thirty five
thousand US Dollars) penalty, - fromUSD 1 670 000.00 up-to
USD 2 505 000.00(two million five hundred and five thousand US
Dollars) Annex 7-Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvX0tZOWdfS0htclU/edit?usp=sharing
32.In fact, the fraudulent former Notary F.E.Gisbertha
and fraudulent Candidate Civil Law Notary Mr. Marlene
F. Mingo not only"transferred" five apartments (property
of The First Applicant), but also added USD 835.000.
(eight hundred and thirty five thousand US Dollars)
interest/penalty. Please compare the total amounts in
Annex 5 and Annex 7.
33. On April.13.2012, based on untrue/forged document
("vonnis" to EJ 20/2012 - Annex 8-Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvUFhkRk9lMXZSUTg/edit?usp=sharing
To a not-existing Court Case the Applicants were arrested
in the Court House of Sent Maarten, prevented of submitting
Closing Arguments in in the pending Appeal Court Case AR
184/2010-H-200/12 and after ten minutes in the Police
Station send directly to Pointe Blanche Prison Sint Maarten
(Annex 9-Pleasevgo to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvNVlfMlBWV3kwZHc/edit?usp=sharing
34.On April.26.2012 Judge Mr.R.W.J. van Veen on his own
initiative acknowledged the existence of Article 5 of
ECHR, and ordered the release of The Applicants (Annex
10-Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvSUw0QnBpcy1lVHc/edit?usp=sharing
under lifetime Home-detention!
35.In fact on March.28.2012 (Annex 9) article 5 of the
European Convention on Human Rights was not applicable and
Judge Mr.R.W.J. van Veen ordered the imprisonment of The
Applicants. One month lateron April.26.2012 Article 5 of
the European Convention Human on Rights was applicable and
Judge Mr.R.W.J. van Veen suspended the imprisonment of the
Second Applicant, and in breach of all Domestic and
International Laws ordered the illegal Home-detention
of the Applicants for indefinite period of time(Annex 10).
36.Since April.26.2012 up to date-March.26.2013 (for eleven
months and counting) the Applicants are under illegal
lifetime Home Detention!
37.The Applicants would like to establish the fact that
all and above it is happening with the know ledge of Hare
Majesteit de Koningin, de Gouverneur van Sint Maarten Dhr
Eugene Bernard Holidayde Minister van Veiligheid en Justitie
Dhr Ivo Opstelten, de President van de Hoge Raad der
Nederlanden Dhr. G.J.M. Corstens, deProcureur Generaal bij
de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Dhr J.W.Fokkens Plaatsvervangend
Procureur-Generaal Mw. C. L.de Vries Lentsch - Kostense, de
Nationale Ombudsman Dhr. Alex Brenninkmeijer, de Procureur-
generaal Dhr. Dick Piar, de Hoofdaanklager Dhr. Hans Mosmr.
H. Bolhaar, zie foto etc!
38.The Dutch Judges are appointed by Royal Decree for life.
They are dismissed by Royal Decree at their own request or
when reachingthe age of 70 years. The President of the Court
Judge Mrs. L.Hoefdraad (born 1951) will retire at age 62
effective Aug.2013!
39.The Vice-President Judge Mr. R.W.J.van Veen will also
nolonger bepart of Joint Court of Justice of Aruba, Curacao,
and Sint Maarten and of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
effective Aug.2013!
40.According to the knowledge of the Applicants, the Chief-
Prosecutor Mr. Hans Mos will no-longer part of the Prosecutors
Office Sint Maarten effective Aug.2013!
41.On March.23.2013 one of the local newspaper informed the
publicity as follows:
Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F.Mingo will be
taking overthe office of notary Francis Gijsbertha ..on
April.05.2013.etc Annex 11-Please go to:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvd3dPY3p3NmJNdVk/edit?usp=sharing
42. It is a fact that the Members of the Judiciary do not
en'joy immunity from prosecution. They are subject to the
ordinary rules of criminal law, but with one exception. To
guarantee that the prosecution and trial of a judge are fair
there is a special statutoryregulation for determining which
court is competent to judge such acase. The taim is to ensure
that judges are not tried in the court in which they serve.
43.On the other hand" in the past fifty years, the Supreme
Court has rarely suspended a judge and has dismissed a judge
only twice. In 2008 because of illness of the judge concerned
and in 2009, due to the incapacity of the concerned judge for
work, due to other reasons than illness Please go to :
http://www.rechtspraak.nl/Organisatie/Hoge-Raad/Supreme-court/The-Procurator-General-of-the-Supreme-Court/Pages/Disciplinary-measures-and-complaints-against-judges.aspx
44. On March.23.2013 one of the local newspaper informed
the publicity as follows:
Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F.Mingo will be
taking overthe office of notary Francis Gijsbertha ..on
April.05.2013.etc.
Annex 11 !
45.As mentioned above, the Second Applicant is with
Bulgarian nationality! It is a fact that, The Netherlands
has been vetoing the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to
the Schengen Area since September 2011 out of concerns for
corruption, organized crime, andrule of law in the youngest
EU member states. The Dutch government has confirmed the
Netherlands' veto on Bulgaria and Romania's Schengen entry
in a briefing to the Dutch MPs (Dutch News reported Sep.
2012).
The opinion of the Applicants is that the following questions
should be asked:
46.Why instead investigated and prosecuted, former Notary
F.E.Gijsbertha was appointed "to represent his vacant
practice location" and continue with the Forgeries, Mortgage
Fraud, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion?
47.Why instead investigated and prosecuted, Candidate
Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F. Mingo will be sworn as
Notary on April.05.2013 and continue with Forgeries,
Mortgage Fraud, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvd3dPY3p3NmJNdVk/edit?usp=sharing
48. Why is necessary Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs.
Marlene F. Mingo to be sworn as Notary, after she is
acting as such and signing documents/summons as Notary
since Sep.12.2011?
49.How Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F. Mingo
will "repay" for the favor (appointed as a Notary instead
investigated)?
50. Is it any Government Institution capable of "breaking"
this endless circle of continuing destruction of the Rule
of Law and fundamental human rights?
51. How many others (specialized in Forgeries, Mortgage
Fraud, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion) will be sworn before
the President of the Court (Mrs. L.Hoefdraad) retire and before
the "departure" of the Vice-President(Mr. R.W.J.van Veen)?
52.How can be possible the victims of criminal activities to
be imprisoned and/or placed under lifetime Home-detention for
requesting Proper Administration of Justice?
53.Is it a common practice the Dutch Judges to share Bank
Accounts with Attorneys (of "white collar criminals" or any
criminals) -
http://www.notarysps.com/Lawtrai%20.htm ?
54.Is it the Joint Court of Justice(Gemeenschappelijk Hof
van Justitie) "the heir" of the Tribunal of the Holy Office
of the Inquisition(Spanish Inquisition), profiting from "
confiscation" of the property of "convicted heretics"/The
Applicants?
55.Why the Honorable Governor of Sint Maarten Mr. Eugene
Bernard Holiday refuse to assure (for over a year- since
Feb.13.2012) the implementation of the Kingdom Laws
(Rijksbesluit rechtspositie Gemeenschappelijk Hof van
Justitie Artikel 53 to Artikel 64)?
56.Why the de Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der
Nederlanden is "blind and deaf" for the severe destruction
of the Rule of Law?
57.Why the Member of the Constitutional Court of Sint Maarten
and Vice-President of the Court(Gemeenschappelijk Hof van
Justitie) Honorable Judge Mr. Jan de Boer is "blind and deaf"
for the severe destruction of the Rule of Law?
58.Is it the ill treatment, illegal punishments, acts of
arbitrariness, acts of direct coercion, flagrant acts of
intimidation and severe destruction of the fundamental human
rights against/ the Applicants the only way to protect the
image and the trust in the Dutch Judiciary?
59.Is it the illegal imprisoned and/or illegal lifetime
Home detention example for the Bulgarian and Romanian Judges
and Attorney-Generals?
60.Is it the intentionally inflicted severe mental suffering
the illegal punishments (aiming to "cover up" criminal
activities within the jurisdiction of the Kingdom of the
Netherlands) example for Proper Administration of Justice
for the Bulgarian and RomanianJudges and Attorney-Generals?
61.Why the competent authorities are placing above the
applicable Laws the President of the Court (Mrs. L.Hoefdraad)
and Vice-President(Mr.R.W.J.van Veen) and refusing to investigate
the severe destruction of the Rule of Law and fundamental human
rights?
62.How all and above can be possible in 21th Century within
the jurisdiction of the one of the founding Members of the
Council of Europe and ECHR?
63.s it not the improper behavior of the President of the
Court (Mrs.L.Hoefdraad) and Vice-President(Mr. R.W.J.van Veen)
one of the main reasons Curacao and Sint Maarten to be considered
as Countries/Jurisdictions of Primary Concern in the report of
the U.S. Department of State 2013(Please go to :
http://www.state.gov/j/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2013/vol2/204062.htm )?
64. What will be the next illegal punishment on the Applicants
for requesting Proper Administration of Justice, speaking the
truth andasking questions-Death Penalty?
65.Is it the ill treatment, illegal punishments, acts of
arbitrariness, acts of direct coercion, flagrant acts of
intimidation and severe destruction of the fundamental
human rights against of the Petitioners the only way to
protect the image and the trust in the Dutch Judiciary?
66.Is it not an obligation on the judicial authorities
themselves not to engage in any prohibited behavior, such
as in the imposition of an illegal punishment?
67.Is it not an overriding obligation for the judicial
authorities to investigate allegations (and evidences)of
illegal punishments?
Personal liberty is a fundamental condition, which everyone
should generally andjoy. Deprivation of liberty is something
that is also likely to have a direct and adverse effect on
the enjoyment of manyof the other rights, ranging from the
right to family and private life, through the right to
freedom of assembly, association and expression to the
right to freedom of movement. Furthermore, any deprivation
of liberty will invariably put the person affected into an
extremely vulnerable position, exposing him or her to the
risk of being subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading
treatment. If therefusal of the judicial authorities to
investigate is aiming to protect the image and the trust
of/in the Dutch Judiciary, the effect is inverse! The
Applicants strongly believe that every reasonable person
(after having verified the accuracy of the facts and their
legal interpretation) will condemn all and above for
unacceptable and damaging the image, the trust and the
reputation of any Judiciary!
Copies of dozens (if not hundreds) compelling evidences
undoubtedlyproving the statements above will be send by
post/FedEx (upon request)!
To read about: In belastingparadijs Nederland koestert
men ook het meest corrupte rechtssysteem ter wereld en
zie de lijst van organisaties die werden geïnformeerd
over die rechterlijke valsheid in geschrifte please go to :
Mr. W.....
Respectfully: Y.Busarov.(Second Applicant).
On behalf of Evmolia PF(First Applicant).
Sint Maarten.
March.26.2013.
Cell: +1721 587 30...
e-mail: jordan@cari..........
overheidcorruptierietveld 
Pingback: Politie Castricum – Duinstreek terreur ( 3 ) Tevens Belasting Paradijs Nederland via Sint Maarten en wel voor Shell & ABN- Amro ! | politiemisdrijvenruudrietveld